Allowed
Simranjit Kaur v. Bagicha Singh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCFAO/1055/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
��������������������������
Date of decision: 29th July, 2013
Simranjit Kaur
� Appellant
Versus
Bagicha Singh and another
� Respondents
������������� ��������!�������"�!��"����������
Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Jagnahar Singh, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vishal Garg, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
��"�!��"���������#�������� �
Learned counsel for the appellant states that by efflux of
time, the present appeal has been rendered infructuous and deserves
to be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
����"�!��"����������� ������
�$%&��'#����(�
���
Singh Rattan Pal 2013.07.30 13:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Simranjit Kaur
Bagicha Singh and another
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court