Single judge held the appeal to be infructuous and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Appeal held infructuous and disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
FAO No.1002 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.7.2013
Archana Devi
-----Appellant(s)
Vs.
Raj Rani & ors.
-----Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:Mr. Jagdeep Bains, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.2.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.
Counsel for the appellant states that this appeal has
become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
July 15, 2013 [RAKESH KUMAR GARG] ak JUDGE
Kumar Ashwani 2013.07.20 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Archana Devi
Raj Rani
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
