Sumer Singh and Anr. Vs State of Haryana etc.

It is the case of the petitioners that vide notification dated 6.5.1996, their land situated in village Sahupura, Tehsil Ballabgarh, District Faridabad was acquired for Institutional, Residential and Commercial Sector 65, Faridabad. It is the further case of the petitioners that in spite of the requests made by them, the respondents did not consider their claim for allotment of plot under the oustees policy of the State Government. In this regard, representation dated 24.6.2012, copy of which is available on record as Annexure P-12, was submitted by the petitioners to the Administrator, HUDA, Faridabad (respondent No. 3 herein), but till date the same has not

¶14

CWP No. 7715 of 2013

¶15

-2-

¶16

been considered and decided.

¶17

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, without issuing notice of motion as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 24.6.2012 by passing a speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months.

¶18

( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE April 10, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE

Sumer Singh and Anr. v. State of Haryana etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumer Singh and Anr. v. State of Haryana etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Simarjit Kaur and Another Vs State of Punjab and Another

Haneef Vs State of Haryana and Others

Madhu Batla Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Deepak Uppal and Anr. Vs HUDA

Inder Kaur Vs State of Haryana and Ors.