Remanded

Gurbachan Singh and Anr.. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Apr 2013CWP/7164/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana, by analogy with a similar petition, directed the Deputy Commissioner of Mansa to objectively decide the petitioners' objections regarding a proposed wardbandi within one week before issuing the final election notification.

What did the court decide?

The Deputy Commissioner, Mansa is directed to decide the objection-cum-representation submitted by the petitioners within one week objectively, in accordance with law, and uninfluenced of any other co

Gurbachan Singh and Anr.. Vs State… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.7164 of 2013 Date of Decision : April 11, 2013

¶3

Gurbachan Kaur and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents

¶4

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.NAGRATH.

¶5

Present : Mr.Rajwant Singh Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.N.K.Verma, Senior DAG, Punjab.

¶6

-.-

¶7

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶8

2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶9

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶10

¶11

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶12

Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 5 only. Mr.N.K.Verma, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on their behalf.

¶13

Let five copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of day failing which the order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶14

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, there is no necessity to issue notice to respondent No.6 nor any counter-reply is required from respondent Nos.1 to 5 at this stage.

¶15

The petitioners are residents of village Lakhiwal, Tehsil Budhlada, District Mansa. Their grievance is against the notification dated 21.12.2012 (Annexure P-3) of the proposed

¶16

CWP No.7164 of 2013

¶17

[2]

¶18

'Wardbandi' issued by the Government of Punjab, whereby wardbandi of ensuing gram panchayat elections is proposed to be carried out for village Lakhiwal, Block Budhlada, District Mansa.

¶19

The petitioners are said to have already submitted their objections on 27.12.2012 (Annexure P-4) but without any response thereto.

¶20

We find that somewhat similar controversy was raised before us in Civil Writ Petition No.2758 of 2013 (Balwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others) which was disposed of with certain directions on 08.02.2013. The present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms and consequently, the Deputy Commissioner, Mansa is directed to decide the objections-cum-representation dated 27.12.2012 said to have been submitted by the petitioners, within a period of one week objectively, in accordance with law and uninfluenced of any other consideration. The final notification shall be issued thereafter only.

Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

(SURYA KANT) JUDGE

April 11, 2013 Mohinder

¶25

(R.P.NAGRATH) JUDGE

Gurbachan Singh and Anr.. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurbachan Singh and Anr.. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

New Generation Residents Welfare Society (Regd) Zirakpur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Amarpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Swarn Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Gurwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Geeta Devi Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Tarsem Singh and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others