The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the matter had become infructuous due to the passage of more than two decades since the original hearing date.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.7024 of 1992 Date of decision:21.03.2013
Anju Gulati & others
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana & others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the petitioners,
Mr.K.C.Bhatia, Addl.A.G., Haryana,
Mr.Ramesh Hooda, Advocate, for respondents No.3, 8, 9, 11 & 13.
Mr.H.S.Gill, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Vivek Goel, Advocate, for respondents No.7 & 12.
G.S.Sandhawalia J. (Oral)
21.03.2013 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
Anju Gulati & others
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
