Man Jitinder Batta & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.5644 of 1993 (O&M) Date of decision:06.03.2013
Manjitinder Batta and others ... Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and others ....Respondents II. Civil Writ Petition No.8017 of 1993 (O&M) Jasvir Singh and others ... Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents III. Civil Writ Petition No.1276 of 1993 (O&M) Jot Ram ... Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and others ....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Amarjeet Sharma, District Attorney, Punjab.
K.Kannan, J. (Oral)
Civil Writ Petition No.5644 of 1993 (O&M) - 2 -
regards the third case, namely, CWP No.1276 of 1993, the case was adjourned to await the decision in CWP No.8206 of 1992. The Registry has noted that CWP No.8206 of 1992 itself has been decided in terms of the decision in CWP No.11023 of 1991. Consequently, all the three cases would follow the manner of disposal in CWP No.11023 of 1991.
Civil Writ Petition No.5644 of 1993 (O&M) - 3 -
put in 18 years of service and who had been given exemption from passing the Assistant Grade Examination on 21.01.1991 and who had passed the AGE and promoted as Senior Assistants, should not be reverted.
“It is further clarified that the promotion to the posts of Assistant (now Senior Assistant) lying vacant prior to 21.1.1991 shall be made from the eligible candidates on the basis of then existing rules by ignoring the exemption from qualifying the test granted w.e.f. 21.1.1991 to those persons who had put in 18 years of service while for promotion to the posts remaining vacant due to non-availability of eligible persons or falling vacant on 21.1.1991 and onwards, such persons who had been exempted from qualifying the test had to be treated at par with those persons who had already qualified such test and their promotion has to be made on the basis of their original seniority-cum-merit basis as Clerks/Senior Clerks/ Junior Assistant.”
Civil Writ Petition No.5644 of 1993 (O&M) - 4 -
(K.KANNAN) JUDGE 06.03.2013 sanjeev
Manjitinder Batta and others
Jasvir Singh and others
Jot Ram
The State of Punjab and others
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court