Petitioners withdrawn an incomplete and evasive writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 26804 of 2013 Date of Decision : 06.12.2013
Karnail Singh & Ors.
.......... Petitioners
Versus
Union Territory Chandigarh & others
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present : Mr. Rubi Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)
Since the averments made in the writ petition are incomplete and evasive, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks and permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action.
Ordered accordingly.
(SURYA KANT) JUDGE
06.12.2013
'Satyawan'
(SURINDER GUPTA) JUDGE
Satyawan 2013.12.11 11:08 "I attested to the accuracy and integrity of this document" High Court Chandigarh
Karnail Singh & Ors.
Union Territory Chandigarh & others
Surya Kant
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
