Tarsem Singh & Anr. v. U.O.I & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.25983 of 2013 Date of Decision: November 27, 2013
Tarsem Singh and another ……Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ……Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA.
Present : Mr.Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Hitesh Kaplish, Central Government Standing Counsel for Union of India-respondent No.1. Mr.Rishi Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2. Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent Nos.3&4.
- Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tarsem Singh and another
- respondent
Union of India and others
Coram
Surya Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/25983/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court