The Punjabi and Haryana High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The court clarified regarding the petitioner's earlier challenge before the CAT as there exists no substantive holding in the judgment.
None. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with a clarifying note.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 25817 of 2013 Date of Decision : 25.11.2013
Anil Dhamija
.......... Petitioner
Versus
The Chandigarh Administration & others
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate
for the petitioner.
SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this writ petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn
However, since the petitioner had earlier challenged the transfer order before the Central Administrative Tribunal, we clarify if he joins the new assignment within two days no adverse inference or action shall be taken against him.
(SURYA KANT)
JUDGE
(SURINDER GUPTA) JUDGE
25.11.2013
'Satyawan'
Satyawan 2013.11.27 14:00 "I attested to the accuracy and integrity of this document" High Court Chandigarh
Anil Dhamija
The Chandigarh Administration
Surya Kant
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
