Ranjit Singh v. U.O.I & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court determined that orders passed in an identical writ petition (CWP No.24736 of 2013) apply. No substantive legal content was provided in this judgment date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.24739 of 2013 Date of Decision: November 13, 2013
Ranjit Singh ……Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ……Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHAVIR S.CHAUHAN.
Present : Mr.Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Hitesh Kaplish, Central Government Standing Counsel for Union of India-respondent No.1. Mr.Rishi Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2. Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent Nos.3&4.
- Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP No.24736 of 2013 (Chanan Singh and others versus Union of India and others)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ranjit Singh
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/24739/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court