Petitioner sought withdrawal of infructuous public interest writ petition. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Prayer allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 23806 of 2012 (O&M)
Charu Sharma Vs. State of Haryana & others
Present: Mr. Tarun Kanjolia, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner makes a
statement at the bar that he does not wish to pursue the present writ petition as the same has been rendered infructuous and seeks to withdraw the same.
Prayer allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
January 22, 2013 (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) lucky JUDGE
Charu Sharma
State of Haryana
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
