The single-judge bench disposed of the current public interest litigation by explicitly relying on an order passed on the same day in a relatedConnected Case (CWP No.7011 of 1991) involving similar parties and issues, thereby avoiding repetition of the reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.18964 of 1991 Date of decision:10.07.2013
Tek Singh & others
.....Petitioners
Versus
Addl.Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, Chandigarh & others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Amarjit Markan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr.Ravish Bansal, Advocate, for Mr.Ashok Singla, Advocate, for the respondents.
Jasbir Singh J.(Oral)
For orders, see order passed in CWP No.7011 of 1991 titled Jagroop Singh & others Vs. Gram Panchayat of Village Bachhona & others
of even date.
(JASBIR SINGH) JUDGE
10.07.2013 (G.S.SANDHAWALIA) sailesh JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
whether the current petition required an independent disposal or could be disposed of by reference to an order of even date.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagroop Singh & others Vs. Gram Panchayat of Village Bachhona & othersDistinguished¶13
CWP No.7011 of 1991 titled Jagroop Singh & others Vs. Gram Panchayat of Village Bachhona & others
Tek Singh & others
Addl.Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab
Jasbir Singh
G.S.Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
