Natha Singh v. Superintending Canal Officer and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed an infructuous public interest writ petition, noting that the dispute between the parties had been compromised.
What the court decided
Kumar Vinod 2013.08.20 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.18525 of 2012 Date of decision:19.08.2013
Natha Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Superintending Canal Officer and others
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Suresh Singla, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
Mr. C.M.Munjal, Advocate, for respondent nos.3 and 4. *****
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J . (Oral)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Natha Singh
- respondent
Superintending Canal Officer
Coram
Rakesh Kumar Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/18525/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court