A one-and-a-half-line oral order referencing a separate judgment passed on the same date regarding reporters and digest reporting. This order itself disposed of nothing substantive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.18160 of 1996 Date of Decision : April 02, 2013
Bichha Ram @ Randhir Singh & another versus
The State of Haryana and others
.....Petitioners
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.NAGRATH.
Present : Mr.Mahavir Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
For orders, see order of even date passed in Civil Writ Petition No.3307 of 1996 (Hari Chand versus The State of
Haryana and others).
(SURYA KANT) JUDGE $ April 02, 2013 (R.P.NAGRATH) Mohinder JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hari Chand versus The State of Haryana and othersReferred¶16
Civil Writ Petition No.3307 of 1996 (Hari Chand versus The State of Haryana and others)
Bichha Ram @ Randhir Singh & another
The State of Haryana
Surya Kant
R.P.Nagrath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
