The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition to pursue other remedies. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed. Liberty granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kumar Vinod 2013.08.08 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.17219 of 2013 Date of decision:08.08.2013
Rakesh Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Wazir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. *****
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J . (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present
petition in order to take up his other remedies in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty is granted.
August 08, 2013 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE
Rakesh Kumar
State of Haryana
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
