Petitioners prayed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 1671 of 2013
DATE OF DECISION : 28.01.2013
Khayal Singh and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel states that the petitioners may be permitted to
withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
January 28, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Khayal Singh and others
State of Haryana and others
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
AMOL RATTAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
