The High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh one on the same cause of action, noting subsequent events during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.16602 of 2013 Date of Decision: December 16, 2013
Santosh Rani and others
.....Petitioners
versus
The State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA.
Present : Mr.Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
It is stated that some subsequent events have happened during the pendency of the writ petition.
As prayed for, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh one on the same cause of action.
[SURYA KANT]
December 16, 2013 [SURINDER GUPTA]
Mohinder JUDGE
Kumar Mohinder 2013.12.17 11:52 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh
Santosh Rani and others
The State of Haryana and others
Surya Kant
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
