In CWP No.15210 of 1992, the petitioner sought reference of his cases to the Labour Court for industrial adjudication. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.15210 of 1992
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.15210 of 1992 Date of decision: 09.04.2013
Purshotam Lal S/o Sh. Shyam Sunder Goswami, R/o H.no.2/492, Thakurwada old Faridabad.
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and another
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Mr. Kartar Singh, DAG, Haryana.
K. KANNAN, J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the petitioner's cases have also been referred for industrial adjudication before the Labour Court. The representation is taken.
The writ petition seeking for such reference is disposed of
as having become infructuous.
09.04.2013 [ K. KANNAN ] Diwaker Gulati JUDGE
Purshotam Lal S/o Sh. Shyam Sunder Goswami
State of Haryana
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
