The High Court at Chandigarh held that the writ petition was rendered infructuous and ordered accordingly, disposing of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 14263 of 2007 Date of Decision: July 17, 2013
Kesar Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
Present : Mr. H.S. Grewal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. N.K. Verma, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL , J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition
has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
July 17, 2013
(JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE
sonika
Sonika 2013.07.18 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Kesar Singh
State of Punjab
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
JASPAL SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
