Oral order regarding a Writ petition. The bench referred to the judgment in CWP No. 13690 of 1994 (Piare Lal and others Vs. Punjab State and others) passed on the same date and directed that the order for those proceedings be followed for the present case. No substantive reasoning or detailed decision is provided in the text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 14129 of 1994
Date of decision: 23.4.2013
Bishan Dass and others
..... Petitioners
Versus
Punjab State and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH
PRESENT: Mr. Manjit Pathania, Advocate for Mr. Arvind Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Om Pal Sharma, Advocate for M.C. Nangal. Mr. Vikram Singh Dhakla and Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, Advocates, for BBMB.
Ms. Munisha Gandhi, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
For orders, see judgment of even date passed in CWP No.
13690 of 1994 (Piare Lal and others Vs. Punjab State and others).
( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE April 23, 2013 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) rishu JUDGE
Bishan Dass and others
Punjab State and others
Surya Kant
R.P. Nagarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
