Qtls. for shelling under contract vide receipt dated 24.01.2010. The contract of shelling was to be completed and the rice was to be delivered up to 31.03.2010, out of which some rice was to be delivered by him to the Central Pool. Paddy to the tune of 10153.24 Qtls., i.e. of a price of 2,84,03,688.90/-, was due from the husband of the petitioner to HAFED. Besides above, certain more paddy was delivered and ultimately rice weighing 8720.55 Qtls. of a price of 1,66,62,293/- including cost of gunny bags, wooden crates and tarpaulins was due from the husband of the petitioner. The petitioner's husband was to pay net amount of 1,61,61,599/- along with interest at the rate of Food Grain CCL monthly compoundable w.e.f. 01.04.2010 for which he issued a cheque towards part payment dated 26.11.2010 of an amount of 25 lacs, which was dishonoured due to “insufficient funds” in his account. An FIR No.441 dated 01.12.2010, under Sections 406, 420, 409 IPC at Police Station Sadar Thanesar was also registered against the husband of the petitioner in addition to initiation of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It has also been noticed in the impugned order that in the said FIR, he was granted interim bail on his assurance that he would return the balance rice but he failed to keep his promise and with a mala fide intention to defeat the recovery of HAFED, has transferred, without consideration, the land in dispute by way of a relinquishment deed in favour of his wife. The transfer of the land was effected during the period when husband of the petitioner was indebted to HAFED. In order to protect public funds, vide letter dated 23/24.03.2011, the Collector, Kurukshetra,
