In a writ petition seeking appointment as a JBT Teacher, the Court held that due to a registry report finding no case for the mentioned number, the petition was stale and infructuous, leading to its dismissal.
The writ petition was dismissed as it had become infructuous and stale.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.13167 of 1990 Date of decision: 26.04.2013
Smt. Ranjit Kaur W/o Ranjit Singh Aman, H.No.B-1/94, Gali No.2, Faridkot Road, Kot Kapura and others
.....Petitioners
VERSUS
State of Punjab and another
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN, J.(ORAL)
The writ petition is for appointment of the petitioner as a JBT Teacher. The case has been directed to be posted after the decision in CWP No.173 of 1980. The Registry has reported that there is no case in the particular number mentioned. With regard to the nature of the relief sought it cannot be of any value at this time if the petitioner is not already been appointed. The petition has become infructuous and stale and dismissed as such.
26.04.2013 [ K. KANNAN ] Diwaker Gulati JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking appointment as a JBT Teacher, when the registry finds no case for the number mentioned, is maintainable.
Smt. Ranjit Kaur W/o Ranjit Singh Aman and others
State of Punjab and another
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
