The petitioner's CWP was dismissed as infructuous because the term of the Board of Directors had expired by the time the petition was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.12758 of 1992. Date of decision : 4th July, 2013.
Gurdip Singh
...... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab & Ors.
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present : Mr. M.S. Kang, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. I.P. Goyat, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that instant petition has been rendered infructuous because term of the Board of Directors has expired on 20th December, 1993.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for petitioner, petition stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
Gurdip Singh
State of Punjab
AJAY TEWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
