Harkesh Singh v. Ut of Chandigarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The judgment is a reference to an oral order passed in a separate concurrent writ petition (CWP No. 12243 of 2013). No substantive reasoning or disposal is contained in this specific text.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 12249 of 2013 Date of Decision:- May 30, 2013
Harkesh Singh
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
Union Territory, Chandigarh and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP No. 12243 of
2013, Sirajuddin Ahmad vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh and others.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Harkesh Singh
- respondent
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Coram
Ajay Kumar Mittal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/12249/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court