Vaibhav Chaudhary v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Mondays High Court refused to entertain a writ petition seeking direction for change of land use approval due to availability of alternate statutory appeal remedy under Section 10 of the relevant Act.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to file appeal under Section 10 of the Act within 10 days of receiving certified copy; limitation not to apply if filed within time.
What the court decided
::1::
CWP No.11495 of 2013 (O & M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11495 of 2013 (O & M) Date of Decision: May 24, 2013
Vaibhav Chaudhary
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether High Court can entertain a writ petition mandamus for directing approval of change of land use where statutory appeal remedy is available.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vaibhav Chaudhary
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/11495/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court