The petitioner sought dismissal of a writ petition on grounds of being infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kumar Vinod 2013.08.07 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.10794 of 2012 Date of decision:05.08.2013
Shinda Singh Sarpanch
...Petitioner
Versus
The Financial Commissioner and others
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate, for Ms. Naiya Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Suresh Singla, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *****
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J . (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has
become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous accordingly.
August 05, 2013 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE
Shinda Singh
The Financial Commissioner
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
