The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The court directed the petitioner to file a representation before respondents no. 2 and 3 for the parking contract grievance, requiring a speedy decision.
Petitioner permitted to file representation with respondents no. 2 and 3 for speedy decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 10503 of 2013 Date of Decision:- May 15, 2013
Jaleel Mohammad
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
State of Punjab and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 15.05.2013 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
Jaleel Mohammad
State of Punjab
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
