Petitioner's writ petition for bail was disposed of as infructuous following the grant of parole under the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(213) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CrWP No.1701 of 2012
Date of decision : 12.2.2013
Satnam Singh
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of UT, Chandigarh & Others
.... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SARON. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. BANGARH.
Present : Mr. H.S. Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. P.S. Thethi, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondent No.3.
S.S. SARON, J.
Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Standing Counsel appearing for
respondents No.1 and 2 has submitted warrant for temporary release of the
prisoner under Sections 3 and 4 of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners
(Temporary Release) Act, 1962.
In terms thereof, the petitioner has been granted parole for
a period of 42 days subject to the condition enumerated in the said warrant.
CrWP No.1701 of 2012
[2]
In view of the warrant being submitted, learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous and may
be disposed of as such.
Disposed of as infructuous.
(S.S. SARON)
JUDGE
(S.P. BANGARH)
JUDGE
February 12, 2013
amit
Satnam Singh
State of UT, Chandigarh
S.S. SARON
S.P. BANGARH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
