Kuldip Kaur v. Kashmira Singh a Nd Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge disposed of criminal revision challenging acquittal, dismissing the petition.
Single judge disposed of criminal revision challenging acquittal, dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Revision No.1944 of 2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 30, 2013
Kuldip Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
Kashmira Singh & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Anhul Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.G.B.S.Gill, Advocate, for Mr.H.S.Bhullar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr.Baljinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 5.
Mr.Sukhdip Singh Brar, Addl.A.G.Punjab, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The only argument raised before me to challenge the acquittal is that writing marked PW2/A was recovered after the death of the deceased, which ought to be treated as dying declaration. This aspect was considered by the trial Court. It is noticed that these were the notes prepared by the petitioner while appearing to make statement in the divorce petition.
I have otherwise considered the evidence. None of the allegations as made would show an abetment on the part of the respondents, for which the deceased could have committed suicide. No case for interference is made out.
Dismissed.
January 30, 2013 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
Kuldip Kaur
Kashmira Singh & others
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court