The High Court dismissed the application owing to the withdrawal of proceedings for lack of sanction. The State was permitted to initiate fresh proceedings after obtaining the requisite sanction. Minutes were signed by the adjudication officer Parveen Kumar.
Permission to the State to proceed after obtaining sanction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A-701-MA of 2012 (O & M) Date of decision: May 09, 2013.
State of Haryana
..... Petitioner
Versus
Shiv Kumar Joshi and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present : Mr. Sandeep S. Mann, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Ms. Amarinder Verma, Advocate, for respondents.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
CRM No.49388 of 2012
Allowed. Delay of 114 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
CRM-A-701-MA of 2012
Learned State counsel submits that proceedings against respondents were dropped at that stage for want of sanction with liberty to prosecution to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law after necessary sanction is accorded.
In view of this, no order is called for.
State of Haryana is at liberty to proceed in accordance with the
directions issued by trial Court.
[ Paramjeet Singh ] May 09, 2013 Judge parveen kumar
State of Haryana
Shiv Kumar Joshi and others
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
