Bail petition where offences under Sections 392, 395, 455, 411 and 120-B IPC were added during pendency. Earlier bail order dated 5.3.2013 was made operative in the added offences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-16374-2013 in CRM-M-459 of 2013. Date of decision: March 19, 2013.
Avneet Kaur
..... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr.B.S.Bajwa, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Ankur Jain, AAG., Punjab.
M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL).
During pendency of the bail application offence under Sections 392, 395, 455, 411 & 120-B IPC have been added. Vide order dated 5.3.2013, the petitioner Avneet Kaur has been granted the concession of bail. The order dated 5.3.2013 will be operative in the above said added offences also.
Disposed of.
(M.M.S. BEDI) March 19, 2013 JUDGE rka
1
Avneet Kaur
State of Punjab
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
