The petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal writ petition to pursue an alternative remedy. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to proceed in the alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-43570 of 2013 Date of Decision: 19th December, 2013
Juna
.. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Mohd. Salim, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedy available to her in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
December 19, 2013
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi)
seema Judge
Sharma Seema 2013.12.20 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Juna
State of Punjab & Ors
Naresh Kumar Sanghi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
