Allowed
Sukhvinder v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/34659/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No.M-34659 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-34659 of 2012 (O & M) Date of Decision: 31.1.2013
Sukhvinder
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present: Mr. Anshuman Dalal, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sagar Deswal, AAG Haryana.
`
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the
petition. Same is allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
31.1.2013 (VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) aarti JUDGE
Sukhvinder
State of Haryana
Vijender Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court