The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held the present criminal miscellaneous petition infructuous and dismissed it as a prior writ petition had already disposed of the matter.
Petition dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-26634 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.09.2013
Tejinder Singh
....Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for
Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Daljeet Singh Virk, AAG, Punjab
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
In view of the order passed in Crl. Writ Petition No. 1333 of
2013, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
11.09.2013
G.Arora
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
Arora Gaurav 2013.09.28 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Crl. Writ Petition No. 1333 of 2013Referred¶14
Tejinder Singh
State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
