Disposed
Anupam v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/2659/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M-2659-2013 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-2659-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 1, 2013
Anupam
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anupam Sharma, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the State submits that after
closure of the prosecution evidence, the case is fixed for the defence evidence and arguments.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner
does not press this petition at this stage.
Disposed of accordingly.
March 1, 2013 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Anupam
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court