The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-23995 of 2012 (O & M) Date of decision:-05.10.2013
Piare Lal and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:Mr. Arun Takhi, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG Haryana.
Mr. Sunil Bindlish, Advocate for respondents No.4,6 to 11 and 13.
Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate for respondent No.5.
Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate for respondent No.12.
RITU BAHRI J.(Oral)
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
05.10.2013 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Asija Vijay 2013.10.08 20:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court,Chandigarh
Piare Lal and others
State of Haryana and others
Ritu Bahri
Vijay Asija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
