The High Court, in a criminal revision matter, allowed an interim order of anticipatory bail and made it absolute, imposing conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The court noted the investigation was not custodial.
Allowed the petition and made the order dated January 23, 2013 absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM M-2207 of 2013
[1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
CRM M-2207 of 2013 (O&M)
Date of Decision: March 21, 2013
Kuldip Singh
…..Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab
…..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.
-.-
Present:Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Ankur Jain, AAG, Punjab.
-.-
M.M.S. BEDI, J.(ORAL)
The petitioner has joined investigation pursuant to the interim order dated January 23, 2013, as per the instructions of HC Nirmal Singh imparted to the State counsel. It does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation against the petitioner.
Petition is allowed and the order dated January 23, 2013 is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
CRM M-2207 of 2013
[2]
March 21, 2013 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim order of bail should be made absolute subject to statutory conditions?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kuldip Singh
State of Punjab
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
