In an oral order, the High Court dismissed a bail petition because the trial court had concluded evidence and the accused had already been examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C., making bail inappropriate at the fag end of the trial.
The bail petition is disposed of (dismissed). Trial to proceed on 07.11.2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rajan Kumar 2013.10.28 16:36 I am the author of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-21351 of 2013 Date of Decision: 28.10.2013
Gurpreet Singh
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN
Present:Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Rana, Deputy A.G., Haryana.
T.P.S. MANN, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel, after obtaining instructions from SI Rishi Singh, has informed the Court that the prosecution has since concluded its evidence. Even, the accused stand examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C. Now, the case is fixed for defence and arguments for 07.11.2013.
Once the trial of the case has practically reached its fag end, it would be inapproriate to comment on the evidence available on record of the trial Court or to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner.
The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
( T.P.S. MANN ) JUDGE
October 28, 2013 Rajan
Gurpreet Singh
State of Haryana
T.P.S. MANN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
