The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition at the stage, noting that parties failed to appear before the trial court for recording statements despite an interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr.Misc. M 19629 of 2012 Date of decision:-14.3.2013
Paramjit Singh Pamma @ Prince and anr
Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab and ors.
Respondent
Present: Mr. OP Sharma, Advocate. Mr. GS Sidhu, AAG, Punjab
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that despite the knowledge of the interim order passed by this court, the parties have not appeared before the trial court to get their statements recorded.
The petition is dismissed at this stage.
March 14 ,2013 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
Paramjit Singh Pamma @ Prince
State of Punjab
M.M. S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
