This order granted the petitioner's prayer for withdrawal of the petition. The matter was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 16374 of 2011 Date of decision : April 02, 2013
Mahinder Singh and another,
...... Petitioners
v.
Karmo Devi @ Pammi,
...... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
Present : Mr. S.S Siau, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the respondent.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?
AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral)
Counsel appearing on behalf of counsel for the petitioner prays
for permission to withdraw this petition.
Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn.
( AJAY TEWARI )
April 02, 2013. JUDGE `kk'
Mahinder Singh
Karmo Devi
Ajay Tewari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
