Petitioner's petition, filed as a brother-in-law of a deceased woman, was dismissed as withdrawn. Court granted liberty to file a fresh petition upon recording the complainant's statement.
Liberty to file a fresh petition after recording the statement of the complainant, i.e., the father of the deceased.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-15634 of 2013 (O&M). Date of decision: May 13, 2013.
Sandeep
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Petitioner is married brother of husband of Vandana and allegedly residing in the same accommodation where Vandana died unnatural death.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition after recording the statement of the complainant i.e., father of the deceased.
(M.M.S. BEDI)
May 13, 2013. JUDGE rka
Sandeep
State of Haryana
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
