In this verzichten judgment, the petitioner sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition at the of the stage. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly. No substantive legal proposition was laid down. Justice Mehinder Singh Sullar disposed of the matter on May 13, 2013. {}
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-15312 of 2013 Date of Decision: May 13, 2013
Lakhi Ram
....Petitioner
Versus Raj Pal Singh Suhag ....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present : Mr. Surinder Mohan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
****
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR, J. (oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant
petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
May 13, 2013 seema/sonika
( M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR ) JUDGE
Lakhi Ram
Raj Pal Singh Suhag
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
