Disposed
Megha and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/14009/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-14009 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: May 01,2013
Megha & Anr.
... Petitioners
vs.
State of Haryana & Ors.
... Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present:Ms. Hemlata Issar, Advocate for the petitioners.
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL)
Megha and Bharat, the petitioners before me, claim themselves to be major and claiming that they have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 6, seek protection to their life and liberty. They apprehend danger to them from the side of respondents no. 4 to 6. They have placed on record marriage certificate and photographs, Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively, evidencing their marriage. The petitioners have submitted representation dated 25.04.2013, Annexure P-5 to respondent no.1.
Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with the direction to respondent no.1 to decide the representation of the petitioners, Annexure P-5 within a period of one month and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is made clear that this order shall
Crl. Misc. No.M-14009 of 2013 =2=
not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law if any committed by them.
May 01,2013 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) Jiten JUDGE
Megha
Bharat
State of Haryana
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court