Disposed
Parmod Chander and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/12512/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
OF 2013 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB…
What the court decided
AI extract
OF 2013 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM NO. M-12512 OF 2013 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-12512 OF 2013 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 26.04.2013
Parmod Chander and another
...Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Petitioners in person along with their counsel Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
The petitioners are present in person and they have stated at the bar that they have married for the first time.
The case of the petitioners is that they are major and have contracted marriage on 10.04.2013. The marriage certificate and the photographs evidencing marriage have been placed on the file. It is alleged that they apprehend danger from respondents No. 4 to 6. To seek redressal of their grievance, they have submitted representation dated 15.04.2013 (Annexure P-7) to the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar.
CRM NO. M-12512 OF 2013 (O&M)
Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. K. D. Sachdeva,
Additional Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice.
Without commenting on the age of the petitioners and validity of the marriage, directions are given to the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar, to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-7) within one month from today, keeping in view the threat perception to the petitioners.
However, it is made clear that in case any criminal case is pending against the petitioners, this order shall not debar the respondents to proceed with.
The petition stands disposed of.
(K. C. PURI) JUDGE
APRIL 26, 2013 shalini
Parmod Chander
another
State of Punjab
others
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court