This judgment dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C filed by Gurdev @ Baldev seeking directions against the State. The Court held that no grounds for interference existed as the petitioner had already availed the remedy by filing a private complaint.
Petition dismissed; no directions issued to authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-12217 OF 2013 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 12.04.2013
Gurdev @ Baldev
...Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. B. S. Chahar, Advocate.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuing
directions to the authorities to take action against the respondents. The petitioner has already availed the remedy by filing the private complaint, as per his assertions.
So, no ground for interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C is made out.
Dismissed.
(K. C. PURI) JUDGE
APRIL 12, 2013 shalini
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C to issue directions to authorities is maintainable when the petitioner has already filed a private complaint.
Whether grounds for inherent jurisdiction interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C exist in the facts of this case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gurdev @ Baldev
State of Haryana
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
