The court dismissed a bail application. Relying on Section 37 of the NDPS Act due to the commercial quantity of poppy husk, the court held no grounds for bail were established.
Bail application dismissed as no grounds were made out under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M-11905 of 2013 Date of decision: 22.5.2013
Kuldeep Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .Respondent
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.C.PURI
Present: Mr. G.S.Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.
K.C.Puri,J.(Oral)
As per allegations, the quantity of poppy husk recovered from the petitioner is commercial in nature.
In view of Section 37 of NDPS Act, no ground for bail
is made out.
Dismissed.
May 22,2013 (K.C.PURI)
nk JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether grounds for bail are made out under Section 37 of the NDPS Act given the commercial quantity of poppy husk recovered.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kuldeep Singh
State of Punjab
K.C.PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
