Partly allowed
Anand Kumar v. Deepak Khunger
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/11796/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-11796 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: May 27, 2013.
Anand Kumar Vashishtha
... Petitioner(s)
v.
Deepak Khunger
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Shri Sumit Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral):
Crl. Misc. No.27942 of 2013
CRM is allowed. The main case is pre-poned to today.
Crl. Misc. No.M-11796 of 2011 and Crl. Misc. No.26309 of 2013 (O&M)
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have entered into a compromise. In view of this, he wants to withdraw the main petition.
Crl. Misc. No.26309 of 2013 is allowed and Crl. Misc. No.M11796 of 2011 is dismissed as withdrawn in view of the compromise. Petitioner will be at liberty to avail remedy available to him in accordance with law if there is non-compliance of the terms of the compromise.
May 27, 2013. kadyan
[ Paramjeet Singh ] Judge
Anand Kumar Vashishtha
Deepak Khunger
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court