Disposed

Inderjeet Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC10 Apr 2013CRM-M/11693/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, without adjudicating merits under Section 482 Cr.P.C., exercised inherent jurisdiction to direct the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to act on a representation filed by the petitioners for protection against life and liberty threats.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No.2, Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to take appropriate action on the petitioners' representation regarding protection of their life and liberty.

Inderjeet Singh and Anr. Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

C.R.M-M No.11693 of 2013 (O&M)

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

C.R.M-M No.11693 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.04.2013

¶5

Inderjeet Singh and another

¶6

...... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

...... Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

¶11

*******

¶12

Present : Mr. D.S. Nigha, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶13

*******

¶14

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶15

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶16

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶17

AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)

¶18

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is for issuance of a direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and not to harass them at the instance of respondent Nos.4 and 5.

¶19

The petitioners have got married against the wishes of their parents. They are stated to be major. In support of his proof of age petitioner No.1 has placed on record a copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate (Annexure P-1) wherein his date of birth is mentioned as 03.11.1988 whereas petitioner No.2 has placed on record a copy of Middle Examination Certificate (Annexure P-2) depicting her date of birth as

¶20

C.R.M-M No.11693 of 2013 (O&M)

¶21

-2-

¶22

15.08.1994. They have also moved a representation before the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana (Annexure P-4) for protection of their life and liberty.

¶23

Without adverting to the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2, the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to take appropriate action on the said representation (Annexures P-4).

¶24

Since the main case has been decided, the pending Criminal Misc. Application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶25

A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the petitioners on payment of usual charges.

¶26

( AJAY TEWARI ) April 10, 2013 JUDGE ashish

Inderjeet Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Inderjeet Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gram Panchayat Village Binjal Vs Director C/H Pb.Etc.

Manjit Kaur Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Pinki & Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Longowalia Yarns Ltd. & Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Pardeep Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Bhajno Vs Sohan Lal and Ors.