Petitioners sought permission for their inter se marriage. Respondents indicated no objection, rendering the petition infructuous and leading to its disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-11097 of 2013
Date of decision : May 01, 2013
Darshpreet Kaur and another
....Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal
Present : Mr. Mukesh Pandit, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Mikhail Kad, AAG Punjab for respondents no. 1 to 3 Mr. M.K.Sajjan, Advocate, for respondent nos. 4 to 7
L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral)
Counsel for respondents no. 4 to 7 stated that respondents no. 4 to 7 have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners inter se and shall not cause any physical harm to them.
In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
May 01, 2013 'dalbir'
Darshpreet Kaur and another
State of Punjab
L.N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
