Single-line oral order declining to record reasons as the petition was dismissed by reference to an identical previous order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRL. MISC. No.M-10691 OF 2013 DATE OF DECISION : 26TH APRIL, 2013
Balwinder Singh
…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
…. Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. J. S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab with Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the complainant.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
For reasons recorded in order of even date passed in CRM No.M-6976 of 2013 titled Sukhwinder Singh verses State of Punjab , the
instant petition for anticipatory bail is also dismissed.
26th April, 2013 (L. N. MITTAL) ‘raj’ JUDGE
Balwinder Singh
State of Punjab
L.N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
